{{tabMeta[tabKey].title}}
{{tabMeta[tabKey].desc}}
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.title}}
{{ item.content.replace(/<[^>]+>/g, '') }}
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
Trends in patenting 2025
Filings to the EPO exceeded 200 000 for the first time, up +1.4% on 2024. Growth was driven by technologies such as AI, quantum technologies, batteries and semiconductors.
Annual report 2025 (French only)
A look back at the first year of actions for the COP 2025-2029
AI in Africa: Regulations are catching up and the courts are already there
Artificial intelligence is no longer a future concept in Africa. It is here, it is being used, and it is now reshaping regulatory agendas and courtroom practice across the continent.
IP Takes Center Stage at Chemical Manufacturer Resonac
In the world of chemical manufacturing, a company is only as good as the products it produces. Whether a manufacturer is “upstream” – producing raw materials like plastics and solvents – or a “downstream” producer of functional tools, it relies on its intellectual property (IP) portfolio of products and processes for continued business success. As a result, the IP department is at the heart of any sizable chemical manufacturer. All the major players have their own teams of IP experts protecting and exploiting their innovations to get ahead of their rivals. But what happens when IP departments from different companies need to work together?
Artificial Intelligence in Culture – Strategic Actions and Initiatives of the Ministry of Culture
Minister of Culture Lina Mendoni, during a press conference held on April 6 in the presence of representatives of the academic and research community, presented the strategic actions and initiatives of the Ministry of Culture for the integration and utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the cultural sector.
IP at F1 Speed – When to Patent, When to Pivot and When to Keep Secrets
IP in the Fast Lane: Lessons from Formula One®
CNIPA and HIPO Extend Focal Point Mechanism Pilot Project
To further promote the cooperation in the field of intellectual property (IP) between China and Hungary and to provide more sustained and effective IP services for enterprises from both countries, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) have, after consultations, decided to extend the CNIPA-HIPO Focal Point Mechanism pilot project for another five years, starting from 1 April, 2026, until 31 March, 2031.
European Intellectual Property Forum (FEPI) 2026
On March 26 and 27 in Paris, FEPI celebrated its 30th anniversary with the theme "Geopolitics, legislation, technologies… and even vocabulary! What new influences on intellectual property?". A long-standing partner of UNIFAB, INPI joined other major players in intellectual property protection at this forum.
2025 ranking of patent applications at the EPO
France remains in second position in Europe
MOIP, MFDS, and KCS Hold Inter-agency Joint Briefing to Combat Counterfeit Cosmetics
- Agency-specific policy directions and support programs presented for responding to counterfeit cosmetics - - Strengthening brand credibility and consumer safety by curbing the distribution of counterfeit cosmetics -
The Ministry of Intellectual Property Increases Budget by KRW 14.5 Billion to Support Corporate IP Dispute Resolution
Joint Briefing Session for 2026 Intellectual Property Dispute Response Support Projects to be held on March 5
Shen Changyu Holds Bilateral Talks with WIPO Director General Daren Tang
Recently, Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), held bilateral talks with Daren Tang, Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The two sides engaged in in-depth discussions on topics including the latest developments in the field of intellectual property (IP) and enhanced cooperation on Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs).
CISAC – New Private Copying Global Study highlights the continued importance of private copying remuneration for creators worldwide.
The new edition of the Private Copying Global Study 2026, prepared by CISAC, BIEM, IFRRO and Stichting de Thuiskopie, provides a comprehensive overview of private copying systems worldwide. The study examines legal frameworks, collection and distribution mechanisms, levy rates, and revenues generated from private copying across 196 countries and five global regions.
Indigenous Biological Resources, cannabis and the conundrum of human introduction
Cannabis is once again in the news in South Africa, with the recent announcement by various government departments of a national cannabis master plan to establish a formal cannabis and hemp industry. At the same time, the government has a long-standing commitment to protecting its local biodiversity, which is embodied in the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004 (the NEMBA). Among its other functions, the NEMBA serves to regulate biotrade and bioprospecting by means of a permit system. Conducting bioprospecting or biotrade activities without a permit is an offence, and can result in a fine of up to ten million Rand and/or imprisonment for up to ten years. The permit process itself is quite involved and requires, among other things, the conclusion of suitable Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs) and Benefit Sharing Agreements (BSAs) with any access providers and/or traditional knowledge holders relevant to that specific instance of biotrade or bioprospecting.
The EUIPO and the European Commission join forces to fight counterfeiting and piracy online
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) will provide consultative support to the European Commission under the Digital Services Act (DSA) to help rights holders and consumers navigate the online world more safely.
The Clever Use of Parameter Limitations Through Two Cases —Converting "How to Make" to "What It Is"
In patent practice, there is a type of claims that often trouble applicants/patentees/inventors and patent attorneys alike — the method claims. Such claims protect a series of operational steps, and while they can directly embody the core inventive concept, they often face difficulties in obtaining evidence(s) and enforcing rights in infringement litigation.
New digital patents services have launched
Today the IPO has launched a suite of new digital services to apply for, manage or renew UK patents.
The Value of Corporate Intangible Assets Worldwide Approaches USD 100 Trillion in 2025; The US Leads High-Income Economies; Morocco, China, and India Top Middle-Income Economies
Intangible assets such as intellectual property (IP), software, data, brands and organizational capabilities exert a growing influence on the global economy despite remaining largely invisible to conventional economic measurement frameworks.
Federal Council elects Béatrice Fink Düring and Nicola Alessandro Mona to the Institute Council of the IPI
The Federal Council has elected Béatrice Fink Düring and Nicola Mona to the Institute Council of the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IPI) with effect from 1 April. Nicola Mona, a citizen of Ticino, succeeds Vincenza Trivigno, who stepped down at the end of 2025 after the Federal Council elected her as the Executive Director of Swissmedic with effect from January 2026.
Once Upon a Time… a Beverage Built an IP Kingdom
Once upon a time, in the age of soda fountains and patent medicines, a modest drink was born in an Atlanta pharmacy. It did not yet know it would conquer the world – but it would, not by magic alone, but by mastering every tool in the intellectual property grimoire. That drink was Coca‑Cola®.
{{item.basicTitle}}
Technology Domain
Publication Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
{{item.basicDescription.slice(0,250)}}{{item.basicDescription.length>250?"...":""}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
{{enterWhos.enText}} Trademark Registration
Registration process
Requirements
| Required information | Required documents |
|---|---|
|
No document required |
Please note:
- {{item}}
-
Principle of trademark protection:Principle of trademark protection;
-
Classification system of goods and services:Nice Classification; multi-class application is available;
-
Requirements for trademark use:The applicant shall provide evidence showing use of the trademark on the designated goods/services. Evidence of use for goods includes but not limited to: product photos printed with trademarks, product packaging, product labels, exhibition pictures, brochures, sales contracts and other purchase documents and information; but advertisements or media reports cannot be used as evidence of effective use. Evidence for services includes but not limited to: the brochures printed with trademarks, web page introductions, contracts for provision of services and other documents.
It is important to preserve the evidence when use a trademark in United States; otherwise the trademark will be partially or totally invalidated over the designated goods and services for not submitting sufficient mark use evidence during the stage of submitting the statement of use. -
An application for trademark registration shall be filed before the U.S. Intellectual Property Office (USTPO), and there must be a basis for filing application in the United States. There are mainly three types:(1)"Intended Use": This basis applies to cases where the trademark has not been used in the United States at the time of filing the application for registration. Based on "intention to use" to file an application for trademark registration, the application can be submitted directly without providing evidence of trademark use. However, when the official passes the trademark examination, an official notice will be issued requesting the applicant to submit evidence of use and the time of first use in the world and the United States in order to obtain a trademark registration certificate. If the trademark has not been used before it is approved for registration, the applicant may postpone the submission of the statement of use for a period of 6 months at a time, for a total of 5 times. If the use evidence cannot be provided in the end, the trademark will be invalid.
(2)"Actual Use": This basis is applicable to the case where the trademark was already used in the United States when the application for registration was submitted. When filing an application for trademark registration on the basis of "already used", evidence of the use of the trademark in the United States and the earliest date of use shall be provided.
(3)"Registration in Other Countries": This basis is used when an application for registration of the same trademark has been submitted in the origin country and the applicant cannot provide mark use evidence in the United States for a short period of time. Application information (including designated goods/services) in the US application should be consistent with those in the application of origin country, and a copy of registration certificate in the origin country should be provided.
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
-
{{item.title.slice(0,60)}}{{item.title.length>60?"...":""}}
{{item.date}}
-
{{item.haha}}
- {{ipType[item.ipType]}}
-
Ready to Manage Your IP Portfolio Smarter?
From AI-powered trademark search to marketplace monitoring — the Kangxin IP Platform turns knowledge into results.
Explore the Kangxin IP Platform
Put your IP knowledge into practice with our comprehensive suite of AI-powered tools.
Disclaimer: We will do our best to present you with as complete and accurate information as
possible.
However, due to the limited frequency of content updates in some countries, all content is for reference
only and has no legal effect.
Jane Chen
