Latest Knowledge Base Articles
- Commerce and Investment Agreement with the US announced
- The 16th Meeting of China-ASEAN Heads of Intellectual Property Offices Held in Shaanxi
- 100 Years of WIPO’s International Design System: Celebrating Iconic Designs for the Ages
- The 2025 ID5 Annual Meeting Convened
- Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
- Berlin Regional Court indirectly exclaims ‘Yippee-ki-yay’ to AI-voice cloning Bruce Willis’ German dubbing artist’s voice
- Intellectual Property Office fees to increase from April 2026
- High Court of London – Case: Getty Images (US) Inc. v. Stability AI Ltd
- Our achievements highlighted in the 2024–25 Annual Report
- Wednesday Whimsies
- Getty Images v Stability: Long-awaited judgment rejects majority of Getty's claim
- Will change people's habits with fireproof box
- ACT sends letter to the European Commission on online piracy of live content
- Author remuneration in the streaming age – exploitation rights and fair remuneration rules in the EU
- EUIPO launches new AI-powered tool to screen trade marks before filing
- BABEK v Iceland: Court of Appeal dismisses invalidity challenge
- Basmati saga continues as New Zealand upholds rejection of certification mark
- [Guest Post] Has G1/23 harmoniously recast the European law of enablement?
- Adapting the old to the bold: Saudi Arabia’s first AI copyright case
- Universities in High-Income Economies Remain the Most Connected Globally, While Universities in Hong Kong, China, the Netherlands, the United States, Qatar, Iran, Brazil, And South Africa Drive Regional Progress
- Unlocking the Commercial Value of Filing in Australia
- Contract Registration with the BPTO: New Rules Make the Process More Efficient and Transparent
- Federal Circuit tells petitioners that IPR denials are unreviewable regardless of reliance on agency guidance in place at time of filing
- Turning Trade Mark Objections into Opportunities: A Business Case for Ex Parte Hearings
- USPTO Expedited Patent Examination Changes - Give and Take
- Samsung v. ZTE motion-to-dismiss hearing, and two new UPC decisions
- Ukraine: navigating the examination and registration framework before the UANIPIO
- United States: how a multi-pronged legislative approach is curbing the online trade in fakes
- Issue Averted - Flip supply chain readiness from burden to value
- Tanzania Court Confirms ARIPO Trade Marks Not Enforceable in Mainland Tanzania
- Nigeria Introduces Temporary Manual Process for Trade Mark Filings
- AI in the Legal Sector: Transforming Law Practices in 2025
- Marketing and business development: what’s the difference?
- Brazil And China Extend Patent Acceleration Program Until 2029
- BPTO Highlights the Role of Intellectual Property in Global Sustainable Development
- Descriptive Use as a Defense to Trademark Infringement in India
- Apples to Apples—Federal Circuit Requires Consistency in DuPont Factors Analysis
- Guide to EU Trademark Renewal
- The EU principle of proportionality as a limit to injunctions in patent law - an analysis of German court practice after the Second Act to Simplify and Modernize Patent Law of 2021
- Patentee's own post-published data undermines the credibility of their broad cat antibody patent (T 0709/23)
- Collaboration between HCO and the Regional Directorate of Primary and Secondary Education of East Attica – “Copyright in our lives” for primary education teachers
- Reframing IP Perspectives: From Lease Clauses to Fragile Vases
- Commercially ghoulish or ghostly? Stan Lee was an ‘AI-powered’ hologram for Marvel fans at LA Comic Con
- “Something Nice” in Every Language: How EUIPO Mediation Turned a Trade Mark Clash into a Sustainable Solution
- Brazil Makes Contribution to Fund WIPO Projects in Developing Countries
- The 22nd Shanghai International Intellectual Property Forum Held
- Renaming Nigeria’s National Theatre: Issues in Law, IP, and Heritage
- IDDQD and Royal Mail v Codeberry: Claim succeeds in addresses database claim
- Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
- CNIPA Deputy Commissioner Meets with Vice President of INTERPAT in Beijing
- adidas v Thom Browne: Court of Appeal upholds invalidity of three-stripe position marks
- Sufficiency at the priority date: A study protocol is not "the same" as a therapeutic effect invention (T0883/23)
- Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
- Shen Changyu Holds Bilateral Meeting with SAKPATENTI Chairman Soso Giorgadze
- UPDATE: Possible trade mark scam alert!
- SA Patent Reform Underway: A Call for Balanced, Modern IP Laws
- Tuesday Tiddlywinks
- "Basmati" decision in Kenya disregards protection of unregistered trade marks
- CNIPA Deputy Commissioner Leads Delegation to Brazil and Argentina for Working Visits
- The new CI GIs system and the use of AI in IP examination, at the October User Group Meeting’s and Liaison Meetings’ agenda
- From peppers to watermelons: Navigating the "dynamic interpretation" of plant and animal patentability (T 2049/23)
- As the AI bubble swells, Spotify’s ‘artist-first’ AI music product announcement might just be code for maximising shareholder value
- K-Patents Go Global: Patent Filing by Koreans Increase Both Domestically and Abroad in the First Half of 2025
- Patent linkage, data exclusivity and public health: approaches for reform
- Brussels Court of Appeal finds Dr Martens’ yellow stitching distinctive
- [Book Review] The Future of Geographical Indications: European and Global Perspectives
- [Guest post] Has G1/23 harmoniously "recast" the European law of enablement?
- [Guest post] The patentability of prohibited practices in the field of AI
- TDM exceptions (not just the three-step test) don’t allow all unlicensed AI development
- The HCO in Epirus – Next Stop: Ioannina!
- Global fight against e-commerce fakes: The EUIPO, OLAF, and international stakeholders share knowledge and expertise
- Opening Ceremony for the 14th CIPF & Awarding Ceremony for the 25th WIPO-CNIPA Award for Chinese Outstanding Patented Invention & Industrial Design Held in Dalian
- On the day of Inauguration, MOIP Embarks on Global Cooperation with WIPO
- Commissioner of Patents guidance update regarding computer-implemented inventions
- The HCO in Epirus – Arta
- Registering a Food Brand as a Trade Mark
- CNIPA Deputy Commissioner Meets with Roche's Chairman of the Board of Directors
- Guide to Trademark Renewal in Malaysia
- Guidance for Foreign Applicants – Trademark Fast Track Options in Brazil
- Update on the Issuance of Electronic Certificates
- New USPTO leadership continues America Invents Act reimagining
- Collaboration of HCO with the Regional Directorate of Primary and Secondary Education of East Attica – “Copyright in Our Lives” for secondary education teachers
- The HCO in Epirus – Visit to the 9th Primary School of Arta.
- Songwriter on a Mission to Protect Music Artists’ Rights in Thailand
- Signs newly notified under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention published – 30 September 2025
- Copyright 101: Understanding the Basics
- New minister appointed with responsibility for intellectual property
- Mac v Q Deck - an object lesson in unregistered designs
- EUIPO-AECM meeting: A new chapter for IP-backed finance
- Bartz v. Anthropic – $1.5 Billion Settlement for Use of Pirated Books in AI Training
- Now you see me: When partial visibility of a design is enough – and when not
- From oil to gemstones: Our shifting understanding of the value of data
- Use of AI in the patent industry: The spectre of hallucination
- 10th Anti-Scam Network Meeting: Strengthening the fight against misleading invoices
- EUIPO expresses solidarity following the earthquake in the Philippines and grants extension of time limits
- Revisiting the 2025 GII Ranking of World’s Top 100 Innovation Clusters: New Venture Capital Deals Metric
- Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
- Use of AI in the patent industry: Solving the confidentiality problem
- Observatory plenary meeting, 30 September – 1 October 2025
- European Union seizes 112 million counterfeit items worth €3.8 billion in 2024
{{tabMeta[tabKey].title}}
{{tabMeta[tabKey].desc}}
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.title}}
{{ item.content.replace(/<[^>]+>/g, '') }}
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
Technology Domain
Publication Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
{{item.basicDescription.slice(0,250)}}{{item.basicDescription.length>250?"...":""}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
{{enterWhos.enText}} Trademark Registration
Registration process
Requirements
| Required information | Required documents |
|---|---|
|
No document required |
Please note:
- {{item}}
-
Principle of trademark protection:Principle of trademark protection;
-
Classification system of goods and services:Nice Classification; multi-class application is available;
-
Requirements for trademark use:The applicant shall provide evidence showing use of the trademark on the designated goods/services. Evidence of use for goods includes but not limited to: product photos printed with trademarks, product packaging, product labels, exhibition pictures, brochures, sales contracts and other purchase documents and information; but advertisements or media reports cannot be used as evidence of effective use. Evidence for services includes but not limited to: the brochures printed with trademarks, web page introductions, contracts for provision of services and other documents.
It is important to preserve the evidence when use a trademark in United States; otherwise the trademark will be partially or totally invalidated over the designated goods and services for not submitting sufficient mark use evidence during the stage of submitting the statement of use. -
An application for trademark registration shall be filed before the U.S. Intellectual Property Office (USTPO), and there must be a basis for filing application in the United States. There are mainly three types:(1)"Intended Use": This basis applies to cases where the trademark has not been used in the United States at the time of filing the application for registration. Based on "intention to use" to file an application for trademark registration, the application can be submitted directly without providing evidence of trademark use. However, when the official passes the trademark examination, an official notice will be issued requesting the applicant to submit evidence of use and the time of first use in the world and the United States in order to obtain a trademark registration certificate. If the trademark has not been used before it is approved for registration, the applicant may postpone the submission of the statement of use for a period of 6 months at a time, for a total of 5 times. If the use evidence cannot be provided in the end, the trademark will be invalid.
(2)"Actual Use": This basis is applicable to the case where the trademark was already used in the United States when the application for registration was submitted. When filing an application for trademark registration on the basis of "already used", evidence of the use of the trademark in the United States and the earliest date of use shall be provided.
(3)"Registration in Other Countries": This basis is used when an application for registration of the same trademark has been submitted in the origin country and the applicant cannot provide mark use evidence in the United States for a short period of time. Application information (including designated goods/services) in the US application should be consistent with those in the application of origin country, and a copy of registration certificate in the origin country should be provided.
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
-
{{item.title.slice(0,60)}}{{item.title.length>60?"...":""}}
{{item.date}}
-
{{item.haha}}
- {{ipType[item.ipType]}}
-
Ready to Manage Your IP Portfolio Smarter?
From AI-powered trademark search to marketplace monitoring — the Kangxin IP Platform turns knowledge into results.
Explore the Kangxin IP Platform
Put your IP knowledge into practice with our comprehensive suite of AI-powered tools.
Disclaimer: We will do our best to present you with as complete and accurate information as
possible.
However, due to the limited frequency of content updates in some countries, all content is for reference
only and has no legal effect.