{{tabMeta[tabKey].title}}
{{tabMeta[tabKey].desc}}
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.title}}
{{ item.content.replace(/<[^>]+>/g, '') }}
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
EPO and IP Australia to launch PCT pilot programme starting 1 March 2026
Australian innovators will be able to choose the EPO as their International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority.
Tackling the misuse of online ads to infringe IP, support IP-infringing activities and mislead consumers
This new discussion paper written in collaboration with the Expert Group on Cooperation with Intermediaries, aims to explain the roles of the different actors in the complex and fast changing online ad ecosystem.
European Commission: Consultation on rights reservation (opt-out) protocols for text and data mining under the AI Act and the GPAI Code of Practice
The European Commission has launched a consultation with stakeholders aimed at supporting the implementation of the obligation for providers of general-purpose AI models to identify and comply with rights reservations expressed by rightholders.
Shen Changyu Meets with Minister of the MOIP of the Republic of Korea KIM Yong Sun in Beijing
Recently, Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), met in Beijing with a delegation led by KIM Yong Sun, Minister of the Ministry of Intellectual Property (MOIP) of the Republic of Korea (ROK).
Renew, Review, Revenue: The IP Cycle No One Talks About
IP renewals are rarely the most glamorous part of an IP strategy. They’re often seen as administrative, repetitive, and frankly boring. But that reputation hides a powerful truth: renewal decisions can save or add millions to a company’s bottom line when approached with a strategic lens.
Enforcement, Remedies and Reform: The Evolution of Trade Mark Litigation in Zambia
The coming into operation of Zambia’s Trade Marks Act No. 11 of 2023 on 26 December 2025 marks a significant shift not only in trade mark registration practice, but also in the litigation and enforcement landscape. By repealing the Trade Marks Act (Chapter 401) of 1958, the new legislation modernises substantive rights, procedural mechanisms, and available remedies, bringing Zambia closer to international norms and materially altering how trade mark disputes will be litigated going forward.
New IP support for SMEs website goes live
The European Union Intellectual Property Network (EUIPN), consisting of the EUIPO, the Member State IPOs and the Benelux IPO, has launched a redesigned website providing Intellectual Property Support for Small Businesses, bringing together guidance, funding schemes and expert support in one place to help small and medium-sized enterprises across the EU protect and manage their intellectual property.
MOIP Launches "Everyone’s Idea" to Fuel "True Growth" through Public Innovation
A nationwide project in full launch to transform public ideas into policy and ventures- - Grand prize winner awarded up to KRW 100 million; top 10,000 winners awarded KRW 30,000; and follow-on support provided for policy and commercialization -
MOIP Strengthens Cooperation with China to Protect K-Brands!
MOIP signs an MOU with the CNIPA on the occasion of the ROK-China Presidential Summit
Why New Zealand and Australian Firms Are Quietly Strong at International IP – And Why Ours Leads the Pack
When people think about international intellectual property work, they often look to the biggest economies – the US, Europe, China. But firms like ours, operating across both New Zealand and Australia, work in a very different environment. That difference gives us a unique edge when it comes to helping exporters protect their ideas on the global stage.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000
The WIPO World Intellectual Property Indicators 2025 record a 43.2% year-on-year increase in Indian design filings in 2024 - the highest growth rate among the top 20 design offices globally.
North Sudan’s IP Department Moves Back to Khartoum, Services Set to Resume Soon
After several years of uncertainty in service availability, the Ministry of Justice of North Sudan confirmed in early January 2026 that the relocation of the Intellectual Property Department from its temporary location in Port Sudan to its original headquarters in Khartoum is now largely complete.
Trademark-related update: New language law to enter into force in Russia from March 1, 2026
Starting from March 1, 2026, a new Federal Law regulating the use of language in public signage will enter into force in the Russian Federation.
SIERRA LEONE - Sierra Leone Trade Marks Regulations, 2024 now in force
The Trade Marks Regulations, 2024 have officially come into force in Sierra Leone following its publication as Statutory Instrument No. 19 of 2024.
New Balance Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Case: A Model and Inspiration for Intellectual Property Protection
In today’s highly competitive market environment, the protection of intellectual property rights has become increasingly important. Recently, the Jiangsu High People’s Court issued a final judgment in a dispute concerning infringement of the “New Balance” trademark and unfair competition. The ruling not only safeguarded the legitimate rights of the trademark owner but also provided a model and valuable insights for IP protection. This article offers a professional analysis from the perspective of intellectual property law.
Understanding Alterations and Non-Standard Use of Registered Trademarks
In commercial activities, companies frequently engage in promotions and product launches that require the display of their trademarks. However, a common dilemma arises when design teams wish to modify a trademark for aesthetic or other reasons. The core question is: Can a registered trademark be altered during actual use without incurring legal risks? This article will provide an overview and guideline for this issue.
HEYTEA vs XICHA: Legal Boundaries and Lessons in Cross-Regional Trademark Infringement
In an era defined by globalization and the rapid expansion of cross-border e-commerce, safeguarding trademarks—companies’ most valuable brand assets—has become increasingly critical.
The Rise of Three Dimensional Trademark: A Guide to 3D Trademarks under China Law
The world of branding is no longer confined to two dimensions. While words, logos, and their combinations have long served as the cornerstone of trademark protection, the competitive marketplace has driven brand owners to seek more distinctive and immersive ways to capture consumer attention.
Strategies and Legal Pathways for Addressing Trademarks Registered for Over Five Years
In the dynamic landscape of business and intellectual property, enterprises often encounter trademarks that have been registered for more than five years but may pose obstacles to their own branding or market expansion. The Chinese Trademark Law provides structured and actionable measures to address such situations. Depending on the specific circumstances, companies may pursue either a Non-Use Cancellation or an Invalidation Action. This article provides a detailed guide to these options, with particular emphasis on invalidation action based on both well-known trademark
Importance of Updating Trademark Name and Address When Your Company Details Change
We often see the situation that the company neglects to update the name and address before the National Intellectual Property Administration, PRC (“CNIPA”) for their trademarks when the company details change. This is not just a simple administrative formality, but a critical legal obligation that protects your business's valuable assets. This article will provide an overview and guideline for this issue.
{{item.basicTitle}}
Technology Domain
Publication Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
{{item.basicDescription.slice(0,250)}}{{item.basicDescription.length>250?"...":""}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
{{enterWhos.enText}} Trademark Registration
Registration process
Requirements
| Required information | Required documents |
|---|---|
|
No document required |
Please note:
- {{item}}
-
Principle of trademark protection:Principle of trademark protection;
-
Classification system of goods and services:Nice Classification; multi-class application is available;
-
Requirements for trademark use:The applicant shall provide evidence showing use of the trademark on the designated goods/services. Evidence of use for goods includes but not limited to: product photos printed with trademarks, product packaging, product labels, exhibition pictures, brochures, sales contracts and other purchase documents and information; but advertisements or media reports cannot be used as evidence of effective use. Evidence for services includes but not limited to: the brochures printed with trademarks, web page introductions, contracts for provision of services and other documents.
It is important to preserve the evidence when use a trademark in United States; otherwise the trademark will be partially or totally invalidated over the designated goods and services for not submitting sufficient mark use evidence during the stage of submitting the statement of use. -
An application for trademark registration shall be filed before the U.S. Intellectual Property Office (USTPO), and there must be a basis for filing application in the United States. There are mainly three types:(1)"Intended Use": This basis applies to cases where the trademark has not been used in the United States at the time of filing the application for registration. Based on "intention to use" to file an application for trademark registration, the application can be submitted directly without providing evidence of trademark use. However, when the official passes the trademark examination, an official notice will be issued requesting the applicant to submit evidence of use and the time of first use in the world and the United States in order to obtain a trademark registration certificate. If the trademark has not been used before it is approved for registration, the applicant may postpone the submission of the statement of use for a period of 6 months at a time, for a total of 5 times. If the use evidence cannot be provided in the end, the trademark will be invalid.
(2)"Actual Use": This basis is applicable to the case where the trademark was already used in the United States when the application for registration was submitted. When filing an application for trademark registration on the basis of "already used", evidence of the use of the trademark in the United States and the earliest date of use shall be provided.
(3)"Registration in Other Countries": This basis is used when an application for registration of the same trademark has been submitted in the origin country and the applicant cannot provide mark use evidence in the United States for a short period of time. Application information (including designated goods/services) in the US application should be consistent with those in the application of origin country, and a copy of registration certificate in the origin country should be provided.
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
-
{{item.title.slice(0,60)}}{{item.title.length>60?"...":""}}
{{item.date}}
-
{{item.haha}}
- {{ipType[item.ipType]}}
-
Ready to Manage Your IP Portfolio Smarter?
From AI-powered trademark search to marketplace monitoring — the Kangxin IP Platform turns knowledge into results.
Explore the Kangxin IP Platform
Put your IP knowledge into practice with our comprehensive suite of AI-powered tools.
Disclaimer: We will do our best to present you with as complete and accurate information as
possible.
However, due to the limited frequency of content updates in some countries, all content is for reference
only and has no legal effect.
Jane Chen
