{{tabMeta[tabKey].title}}
{{tabMeta[tabKey].desc}}
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.title}}
{{ item.content.replace(/<[^>]+>/g, '') }}
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
The EUIPO and the EIT organise the fifth edition of the IP Masterclass for school students and teachers
On 25 April 2025, on the occasion of World IP Day 2025, the EUIPO’s IP Next-GEN initiative and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) – EIT RawMaterials, organised a joint IP masterclass attended by more than 400 secondary school students and teachers who are part of the Girls Go Circular initiative.
World IP Day 2025 - The IP orchestra: how users compose the future of Intellectual Property
This World IP Day 2025, themed around music, innovation and creativity, is a powerful reminder that intellectual property is not only about protection – it is about creativity and impact. Music is a universal language – one that unites us, evokes deep emotion, and reflects our shared humanity. Whether through rhythm or lyrics, it relies on a strong framework of IP rights to ensure creators are recognised, respected and fairly rewarded for their work.
Of tables and other furniture: AG Szpunar advises CJEU on originality （but also proposes adoption of recognizability test for infringement）
Is it true that originality is the only thing that matters in copyright law, including for works of applied art? If so, how is it to be assessed? And what does the infringement test under copyright law entail?
Commercial success is a nothing-burger for the EPO in Wegovy patent inventive step analysis
In recent years, Novo Nordisk's weight loss drug semaglutide, marketed as Wegovy for obesity and Ozempic for diabetes, has become a pharmaceutical phenomenon. As with most successful pharmaceutical products, the remarkable success of semaglutide means we can also expect some high profile IP disputes. In jurisdictions lacking provisions for patent term extension, semaglutide is expected to face generic challenge as early as 2026. However, in addition to composition of matter protection, Novo Nordisk have attempted to bolster protection for semaglutide with a number of life cycle patents. The recent Board of Appeal decision in T 1701/22 related to one of these patent families (expiring in 2033) covering pharmaceutical composition of semaglutide for use in treatment of obesity, at a specific dose and formulation pH. Novo Nordisk ultimately failed to convince the EPO that the patent was non-obvious in view of known use of GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide for weight-loss, despite post-published clinical data and expert testimonials proclaiming the game-changing nature of the drug.
Protecting your unique product against look-alikes
Find out how a design right could protect your business.
We’ve improved the plant breeder’s rights manual
An updated PBR Manual was released on 2 April.
Risks and Considerations of Trademark Usage: A Comprehensive Analysis and Practical Guide
Nowadays, under the highly competitive business environment, trademarks represent a crucial asset for enterprises, making their protection and proper usage vitally important. Meanwhile, there are numerous risks associated with trademark usage, and mishandling them can result in significant damage to trademark rights.
Young Inventors Prize 2025: Congratulations to Marie Perrin, French-American chemist, selected among the ten best innovators!
On May 6, 2025, the European Patent Office (EPO) announced the names of the ten best innovators for the 2025 Young Inventors Prize. This competition recognizes exceptional innovators aged 30 or younger recognized for their outstanding contributions to sustainability, health, and industry. Congratulations to Marie Perrin, a 28-year-old French-American chemist, for her REEcover technology, which recovers europium using a process inspired by nature.
EUIPO and OECD publish a report on counterfeit and pirated trade
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have unveiled the results of their study Mapping Global Trade in Fakes 2025: Global Trends and Enforcement Challenges.
Out Now – Update on Recent European Case-Law on the Infringement and Enforcement of IP rights
A new report has been published providing an update on the most significant recent European decisions concerning the infringement and enforcement of intellectual property rights. The document contains over 250 summaries of key judgments from national courts and preliminary rulings from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
IPOPHL launches new rules to give well-known marks enhanced protection
The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) released the Rules and Regulations and Creation of the Register to help prestigious brands grow with broader levels of protection and increased valuation.
Example: A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field
THE most obvious mechanical phenomenon in electrical and magnetic experiments is the mutual action by which bodies in certain states set each other in motion while still at a sensible distance from each other.
A Global Perspective on Trademark Opposition
In the journey of trademark registration, the opposition process is a crucial checkpoint that can determine the fate and market position of a brand. Trademark opposition procedures vary across countries, from publication periods to opposition rulings, where legal and business wisdom come into play at every step.
Assigning registered intellectual property rights in Australia: legal requirements and the importance of clarity
The assignment of intellectual property (IP) is a crucial aspect of business transactions in Australia. Whether it involves patents, trademarks, or designs, properly transferring ownership is essential to protect the rights of both the assignor and the assignee. Understanding the legal requirements and best practices for IP assignment can prevent costly disputes and ensure a smooth transfer of ownership.
It is finally real – changes to EU design law start to take effect
As of 1 May 2025, key amendments to the new European Union Design Regulation (EUDR) will become a reality, marking the beginning of a significant overhaul of the EU design protection regime.
The plausibility of diagnostic inventions: No data, no patent
In T 0589/22, the Board of Appeal revoked a patent for an in vitro diagnostic method on the basis that the claimed diagnostic effect was not rendered plausible. According to the Board of Appeal's interpretation of the claims, none of the examples in the patent related to the population of subjects defined by the claims. The Board of Appeal thus considered the claimed diagnostic effect to be insufficiently disclosed. Citing G 2/21, the Board of Appeal also found that post-published evidence could not remedy this deficiency. The decision in T 0589/22 is therefore interesting for two reasons. First, it confirms that G 2/21 did not change the established approach of the EPO to the sufficiency standard for diagnostic and medical inventions. Second, the case reinforces the need for clarity of definition when defining patient populations, having a mind both to claim validity and enforcement.
CNIPA Holds Open Day Event
On April 25, as the 25th World Intellectual Property Day approached, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) held its Open Day event for the 20th consecutive year. CNIPA Commissioner Shen Changyu attended and delivered a speech, while Deputy Commissioner Hu Wenhui presided over the main event.
On the use of GIs as ingredients: the aftertaste of Champagner Sorbet
While The IPKat has extensively covered the recent reform of EU geographical indications (GI) law [see here and here], one element deserves further attention: Art. 27 of the Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 concerning the use of GIs for wines and agricultural products as ingredients in processed products.
EUIPO rules in favour of Mercedes-Benz in radiator grille EUTM appeal （R 2316/2024-1）
A recent decision of the First Board of Appeal (the Board) of the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) found that a sign depicting a radiator grille was sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trade mark in the EU.
Patents Ordinance to be adapted and modernised in line with revised Patents Act
The Federal Council opened the consultation on the complete revision of the Patents Ordinance on 30 April 2025. The revision is necessary because the Federal Assembly passed a partial revision of the Patents Act in March 2024. The Federal Council is using this opportunity to completely revise and modernise the currently applicable ordinance, which has been in force since 1978. The consultation period will run until 22 August 2025.
{{item.basicTitle}}
Technology Domain
Publication Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
{{item.basicDescription.slice(0,250)}}{{item.basicDescription.length>250?"...":""}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
{{enterWhos.enText}} Trademark Registration
Registration process
Requirements
| Required information | Required documents |
|---|---|
|
No document required |
Please note:
- {{item}}
-
Principle of trademark protection:Principle of trademark protection;
-
Classification system of goods and services:Nice Classification; multi-class application is available;
-
Requirements for trademark use:The applicant shall provide evidence showing use of the trademark on the designated goods/services. Evidence of use for goods includes but not limited to: product photos printed with trademarks, product packaging, product labels, exhibition pictures, brochures, sales contracts and other purchase documents and information; but advertisements or media reports cannot be used as evidence of effective use. Evidence for services includes but not limited to: the brochures printed with trademarks, web page introductions, contracts for provision of services and other documents.
It is important to preserve the evidence when use a trademark in United States; otherwise the trademark will be partially or totally invalidated over the designated goods and services for not submitting sufficient mark use evidence during the stage of submitting the statement of use. -
An application for trademark registration shall be filed before the U.S. Intellectual Property Office (USTPO), and there must be a basis for filing application in the United States. There are mainly three types:(1)"Intended Use": This basis applies to cases where the trademark has not been used in the United States at the time of filing the application for registration. Based on "intention to use" to file an application for trademark registration, the application can be submitted directly without providing evidence of trademark use. However, when the official passes the trademark examination, an official notice will be issued requesting the applicant to submit evidence of use and the time of first use in the world and the United States in order to obtain a trademark registration certificate. If the trademark has not been used before it is approved for registration, the applicant may postpone the submission of the statement of use for a period of 6 months at a time, for a total of 5 times. If the use evidence cannot be provided in the end, the trademark will be invalid.
(2)"Actual Use": This basis is applicable to the case where the trademark was already used in the United States when the application for registration was submitted. When filing an application for trademark registration on the basis of "already used", evidence of the use of the trademark in the United States and the earliest date of use shall be provided.
(3)"Registration in Other Countries": This basis is used when an application for registration of the same trademark has been submitted in the origin country and the applicant cannot provide mark use evidence in the United States for a short period of time. Application information (including designated goods/services) in the US application should be consistent with those in the application of origin country, and a copy of registration certificate in the origin country should be provided.
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
-
{{item.title.slice(0,60)}}{{item.title.length>60?"...":""}}
{{item.date}}
-
{{item.haha}}
- {{ipType[item.ipType]}}
-
Ready to Manage Your IP Portfolio Smarter?
From AI-powered trademark search to marketplace monitoring — the Kangxin IP Platform turns knowledge into results.
Explore the Kangxin IP Platform
Put your IP knowledge into practice with our comprehensive suite of AI-powered tools.
Disclaimer: We will do our best to present you with as complete and accurate information as
possible.
However, due to the limited frequency of content updates in some countries, all content is for reference
only and has no legal effect.
Jane Chen
