{{tabMeta[tabKey].title}}
{{tabMeta[tabKey].desc}}
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.title}}
{{ item.content.replace(/<[^>]+>/g, '') }}
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
The Trilateral offices shared an enlightening summary of initiatives for promoting resilient innovation
The Trilateral offices – the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – have shared an enlightening summary of current and recent initiatives (External link) that promote resilient innovation. The roundup also includes contributions from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and reflects the commitment of all four institutions to an IP-driven future. These initiatives address two key challenges: how to leverage intellectual property (IP) strategically and how to ensure the granting of high-quality patents.
Service by Publication
For cases where documents have not been serviced by delivery (undeliverable to the recipient, etc.), the JPO eventually executes Service by Publication by means of publicizing such information in the Official Gazette and the Patent Gazette, posting in the area designated for posting at the JPO office, or displaying on PCs placed at the JPO office for public perusal. (Patent Act Article 191 (where applicable mutatis mutandis to Article 55-2 of the Utility Model Act, Article 68-5 of the Design Act, and Article 77-5 of the Trademark Act.))
‘Ghiblification’ and the Moral Wrongs of U.S. Copyright Law
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Angela Chung (Berkeley Law) reflecting on the flaws and grey areas for artistic protection through the moral rights of the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) in the era of AI, and discussing the controversies of the recent Studio Ghibli AI craze as a starting point to get at the heart of ethical concerns on artistic extraction. Here's what Angela writes:
One copyright to rule them all?
All intellectual property rights have a limited territorial scope. This can make it difficult to determine if an IP right is infringed, particularly when the contested use takes place online. The German Supreme Court recently dealt with the question of the commercial effect of two websites which were primarily directed at Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
Publication of Japan-China-Korea Concordance List of Similar Group Codes
The Japan Patent Office (JPO), the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) are working on a cooperative project to compile concordance lists that indicate the corresponding relationships among the respective, similar group codes used for trademark examination at the JPO, the CNIPA and the KIPO, based on a trilateral agreement the three offices signed.
The JPO Quick Reads
In the JPO Quick Reads, KITAMURA Hiroki, Director-General, Patent Examination Department, briefly introduces the JPO initiatives and information on every Monday!
Transformation of IP Offices through responsible use of AI by James Nurton
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous throughout business and society. We are starting to use AI tools in all aspects of our daily lives, from writing messages and internet searching to shopping, travelling and studying.
JPO Holds Opinion Exchange with FICPI
The Japan Patent Office (JPO) held a meeting on April 7, 2025 to exchange opinions with the International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys (FICPI*).
Shen Changyu Meets with Director General of Danish Patent and Trademark Office and Ambassador of Denmark to China
Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), met in Beijing with Sune Stampe Sørensen, Director General of the Danish Patent and Trademark Office, and Michael Starbæk Christensen, the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Denmark to China recently. The two sides engaged in in-depth discussions on the latest progress in IP work in both countries and the implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on IP cooperation between the two offices.
Denmark-China Industry Roundtable Meeting Held in Beijing
The Denmark-China Industry Roundtable Meeting was held in Beijing recently. The meeting was chaired by Lu Pengqi, Deputy Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), with Sune Stampe Sørensen, Director General of the Danish Patent and Trademark Office, and Michael Starbæk Christensen, the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Denmark to China attending the meeting and delivering speeches.
Use versus process patents: Implications for novelty and scope
The recent decision T 1913/21 highlights a crucial differentiation between second non-medical use claims and process claims. The Board of Appeal found that, according to the established case law, claims in which the technical effect of the invention occurs only as part of a process for producing a product, must be regarded as a process claim and not second non-medical use claims. This distinction has significant implications for the novelty and scope of protection of the claims.
Analysis of Graphic Trademark and Combination Trademark Similarity Determination
In today's increasingly competitive market environment, trademarks are essential identifiers of a company's image and product recognition. Graphic trademarks, as well as Combination trademark of graphics and text (the following text refers to "Combination mark"), are a primary form of trademarks characterized by their intuitiveness, ease of recognition, and memory.
Smart Parallel Import and Trademark Infringement: Legal Battles and Strategic Responses from a Global Perspective
In the globalized and technology-driven era, the phenomenon of smart parallel importation has sparked intense debates regarding trademark infringement. Different countries hold varying positions on whether parallel imports constitute trademark infringement, with significant differences in legal systems and judicial practices.
Trademark Lawsuit for “Luckin Coffee” in Thailand: A Wake-Up Call for Chinese enterprises’ Overseas Trademark Protection Strategy
In recent years, with the accelerated international expansion of Chinese companies, overseas trademark disputes have become increasingly prevalent, posing a significant barrier for businesses venturing abroad. The trademark lawsuit involving Luckin Coffee in Thailand is a prime example of this phenomenon.
Guide to Trademark Renewal in South Korea
In South Korea, trademarks are a critical intangible asset for businesses, embodying brand value, reputation, and market competitiveness. With the ever-evolving market environment and increasing competition, ensuring the ongoing validity of trademarks has become essential for safeguarding brand rights. This guide provides a detailed overview of the trademark renewal process in South Korea, key considerations, and strategies to address challenges, particularly in managing renewal deadlines. We also recommend the Brand Management Module on the Kangxin IP Platform to help businesses efficiently handle their South Korean trademark renewal tasks.
Important Update on Trademark Regulations in Indonesia
Important Update on Trademark Regulations in Indonesia
Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property Designates the United States Patent and Trademark Office as a PCT International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority
The Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP), the official body responsible for intellectual property matters within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has officially designated the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as an International Searching Authority (ISA) and an International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
Journal 2539
In this Part of the Journal, a reference to a section is to a section of the Patents Act, 1992 unless otherwise stated.
WIPO, IPO-Pakistan launch inventor assistance programme to empower Pakistani innovators
ISLAMABAD, April 9, 2025: The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan (IPO-Pakistan) have launched the Inventor Assistance Program (IAP) in Pakistan, a significant initiative aimed at empowering local innovators and entrepreneurs.
Copyright in Esports – How Isurus Stays Ahead of the Game
The esports industry is a global phenomenon that merges competitive gaming, digital content creation, and entertainment. However, behind the high-energy tournaments and engaging live streams, teams must navigate a complex legal landscape, especially when it comes to copyright protection. From securing broadcasting rights to protecting original content like music, comics, and branding, leading esports organizations must ensure their intellectual property remains safeguarded.
{{item.basicTitle}}
Technology Domain
Publication Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
{{item.basicDescription.slice(0,250)}}{{item.basicDescription.length>250?"...":""}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
{{enterWhos.enText}} Trademark Registration
Registration process
Requirements
| Required information | Required documents |
|---|---|
|
No document required |
Please note:
- {{item}}
-
Principle of trademark protection:Principle of trademark protection;
-
Classification system of goods and services:Nice Classification; multi-class application is available;
-
Requirements for trademark use:The applicant shall provide evidence showing use of the trademark on the designated goods/services. Evidence of use for goods includes but not limited to: product photos printed with trademarks, product packaging, product labels, exhibition pictures, brochures, sales contracts and other purchase documents and information; but advertisements or media reports cannot be used as evidence of effective use. Evidence for services includes but not limited to: the brochures printed with trademarks, web page introductions, contracts for provision of services and other documents.
It is important to preserve the evidence when use a trademark in United States; otherwise the trademark will be partially or totally invalidated over the designated goods and services for not submitting sufficient mark use evidence during the stage of submitting the statement of use. -
An application for trademark registration shall be filed before the U.S. Intellectual Property Office (USTPO), and there must be a basis for filing application in the United States. There are mainly three types:(1)"Intended Use": This basis applies to cases where the trademark has not been used in the United States at the time of filing the application for registration. Based on "intention to use" to file an application for trademark registration, the application can be submitted directly without providing evidence of trademark use. However, when the official passes the trademark examination, an official notice will be issued requesting the applicant to submit evidence of use and the time of first use in the world and the United States in order to obtain a trademark registration certificate. If the trademark has not been used before it is approved for registration, the applicant may postpone the submission of the statement of use for a period of 6 months at a time, for a total of 5 times. If the use evidence cannot be provided in the end, the trademark will be invalid.
(2)"Actual Use": This basis is applicable to the case where the trademark was already used in the United States when the application for registration was submitted. When filing an application for trademark registration on the basis of "already used", evidence of the use of the trademark in the United States and the earliest date of use shall be provided.
(3)"Registration in Other Countries": This basis is used when an application for registration of the same trademark has been submitted in the origin country and the applicant cannot provide mark use evidence in the United States for a short period of time. Application information (including designated goods/services) in the US application should be consistent with those in the application of origin country, and a copy of registration certificate in the origin country should be provided.
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
-
{{item.title.slice(0,60)}}{{item.title.length>60?"...":""}}
{{item.date}}
-
{{item.haha}}
- {{ipType[item.ipType]}}
-
Ready to Manage Your IP Portfolio Smarter?
From AI-powered trademark search to marketplace monitoring — the Kangxin IP Platform turns knowledge into results.
Explore the Kangxin IP Platform
Put your IP knowledge into practice with our comprehensive suite of AI-powered tools.
Disclaimer: We will do our best to present you with as complete and accurate information as
possible.
However, due to the limited frequency of content updates in some countries, all content is for reference
only and has no legal effect.
Jane Chen
