{{tabMeta[tabKey].title}}
{{tabMeta[tabKey].desc}}
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
{{item.title}}
{{ item.content.replace(/<[^>]+>/g, '') }}
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
Update to Non-Use Cancellation Proceedings in China
As part of the examination process of trade mark applications in China, non-use cancellation proceedings are a relatively inexpensive option which trade mark applicants can use to overcome the citation of prior trade mark registrations against their application.
CNIPA Deputy Commissioner Leads Delegation to Visit Finland and Austria upon Invitation
Zhang Zhicheng, Deputy Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), led a delegation on a working visit to Finland and Austria upon invitation.
Korean TM Opposition Deadline Cut to 30 Days
This is a final reminder that, pursuant to the amended Korean Trademark Act (Act No. 20697), the opposition period will be reduced to 30 days for trademark applications published on or after July 22, 2025.
CNIPA Deputy Commissioner Leads Delegation to UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey for Working Visit
Recently, Hu Wenhui, Deputy Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), led a delegation to the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey for a working visit.
The Informative User Guide for the View and Drawing Requirements of Designs Released
Since 2015, the Industrial Designs 5 (ID5) offices have been engaged in ongoing cooperation in the field of industrial design. These collaborative efforts aim to enhance mutual understanding, raise public awareness of design protection, and provide better services to users worldwide.
The JPO Quick Reads
In the JPO Quick Reads, KITAMURA Hiroki, Director-General, Patent and Design Examination Department, briefly introduces the JPO initiatives and information on every Monday!
Nauru national anti-corruption strategy stakeholder engagement and consultation
The Secretary for Justice and Border Control, Mr. Jay Udit officially opened and facilitated on Wednesday 25 June 2025, a stakeholder engagement and consultation workshop where key stakeholders were invited to a strategic dialogue on the formulation of a new National Anti-corruption Strategy (NACS) for Nauru. The strategic dialogue provided the opportunity for key stakeholders to provide inputs on developing a new NACS for Nauru.
The conflict and convergence of mātauranga Māori-derived inventions with the IP system: a case study of hāngī patents
Indigenous peoples’ use of the patent system is often discussed in a binary fashion, in either a celebratory manner of ‘success cases’ or to discuss why Indigenous peoples cannot use the patent system.
Analysis of the LABUBU Trademark Layout and Protection Strategy
LABUBU is one of Pop Mart’s most iconic IPs, having skyrocketed to fame with its unique “ugly-cute” design. This little creature—sporting nine teeth and a rebellious yet endearing personality—has been a phenomenon in the trend-driven toy market since its debut.
Shen Changyu Holds Bilateral Meetings with Heads of IP Offices from Multiple Countries and Regions and Attends BRICS Heads of IP Offices Meeting
From July 7 to 9 local time, during the Sixty-Sixth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), held bilateral meetings with the heads of intellectual property (IP) offices from Singapore, Hungary, Spain, France, Denmark, Australia and Morocco, as well as the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) in Geneva, Switzerland. Shen also participated in the Informal Ministerial Policy Dialogue hosted by WIPO and attended the BRICS Heads of Intellectual Property Offices Meeting.
Shen Changyu Holds Bilateral Meeting with WIPO Director General Daren Tang
On the morning of July 7 local time, during the Sixty-Sixth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), held a bilateral meeting with WIPO Director General Daren Tang in Geneva, Switzerland. The two sides had an in-depth exchange of views on topics including China's latest developments in intellectual property (IP), artificial intelligence, and bilateral cooperation.
Shen Changyu Leads Delegation to Attend the Sixty-Sixth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO and Delivers General Statement
On July 8, the Sixty-Sixth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) convened in Geneva, Switzerland. Hu Heping, Executive Deputy Head of the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, and Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), attended the meetings. On behalf of the Chinese government delegation, Shen delivered a general statement.
Inventions for photovoltaics increased more than seventeen-fold in three decades
The latest technology insight report from the EPO’s Observatory on Patents and Technology reveals that innovation in photovoltaics has experienced significant growth over the last three decades.
Country of Iceland successfully freezes out British supermarket's trade marks on the grounds of descriptiveness
Yesterday, the EU General Court ruled against the major British supermarket, Iceland, in its trade mark dispute with the nation of Iceland.
EUIPO Strengthens Global IP Partnerships in Geneva: A Pivotal Week of Collaboration
Cooperation lies in the DNA of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) as was evidenced during a series of high-level meetings in Geneva from 7 to 11 July. EUIPO met, on the sidelines of the WIPO General Assemblies, more than 100 heads of national, regional, and international IP offices, including representatives from China, South Korea, Brazil, India and the United States, and other key global IP administrations. Following the mandate of SP2030, the meetings fostered stronger IP alliances focusing on advanced forward-thinking for IP systems worldwide.
Meeting of IPR Enforcement Coordination Committee, Lahore
The Meeting was chaired by Ambassador (R) Farukh Amil, Chairperson IPO-Pakistan and attended by Ms. Amina Rafique, Additional Director General, Punjab Food Authority (PFA), Lahore; Mr. Ishtiaq Shafiq, Deputy Director, DRAP, Lahore; Mr. Umar Khawar, Assistant Director FIA, Lahore; Mr. Sadaqtum Nazar Ali Khan, Assistant Director and Ms. Hijab Nawaz, Preventive Officer from Directorate IPR Enforcement, Customs Lahore; Mr. Amir Maqbool Bhatti, Assistant Director, PEMRA, Lahore; Mr. Nasir Hameed, DSP, Punjab Police, Lahore; Kamaran Javed, Director (R&D) LCCI, Lahore.
European Parliament Think Tank – Study on Generative AI and Copyright
A new study conducted for the European Parliament Think Tank, by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (Policy Department C), at the request of the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI), sheds light on critical questions regarding the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on EU copyright law.
MASTER YOUR RIGHTS: HOW SOUTH AFRICAN ARTISTS CAN USE CONTRACTS TO SECURE OWNERSHIP OF THEIR MASTERS
For many South African musicians, landing a record deal feels like the breakthrough they have been working toward. But amid the excitement of studio sessions and album plans, one critical question is often overlooked: who owns the masters?
Copyright of photography and artificial intelligence: a tale of two technologies
This article revisits historical debates over the status of photography in the 19th century to shed light on current legal and philosophical challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI) in the creative sphere. Just as early critics questioned whether photographs could be considered art or original expression, today’s disputes turn on whether AI-generated outputs qualify for copyright protection. These parallels illuminate a recurring tension in copyright law: how to distinguish technological mediation from human authorship.
4 Effective Appeal Strategies When a Trademark is Refused in Cambodia and Insights for International Investors
Background: Trademark Refused for “Confusing Similarity”
{{item.basicTitle}}
Technology Domain
Publication Date
-
{{item.basicTitle}}
{{item.basicDescription.slice(0,250)}}{{item.basicDescription.length>250?"...":""}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
-
{{item.showText}}
{{enterWhos.enText}} Trademark Registration
Registration process
Requirements
| Required information | Required documents |
|---|---|
|
No document required |
Please note:
- {{item}}
-
Principle of trademark protection:Principle of trademark protection;
-
Classification system of goods and services:Nice Classification; multi-class application is available;
-
Requirements for trademark use:The applicant shall provide evidence showing use of the trademark on the designated goods/services. Evidence of use for goods includes but not limited to: product photos printed with trademarks, product packaging, product labels, exhibition pictures, brochures, sales contracts and other purchase documents and information; but advertisements or media reports cannot be used as evidence of effective use. Evidence for services includes but not limited to: the brochures printed with trademarks, web page introductions, contracts for provision of services and other documents.
It is important to preserve the evidence when use a trademark in United States; otherwise the trademark will be partially or totally invalidated over the designated goods and services for not submitting sufficient mark use evidence during the stage of submitting the statement of use. -
An application for trademark registration shall be filed before the U.S. Intellectual Property Office (USTPO), and there must be a basis for filing application in the United States. There are mainly three types:(1)"Intended Use": This basis applies to cases where the trademark has not been used in the United States at the time of filing the application for registration. Based on "intention to use" to file an application for trademark registration, the application can be submitted directly without providing evidence of trademark use. However, when the official passes the trademark examination, an official notice will be issued requesting the applicant to submit evidence of use and the time of first use in the world and the United States in order to obtain a trademark registration certificate. If the trademark has not been used before it is approved for registration, the applicant may postpone the submission of the statement of use for a period of 6 months at a time, for a total of 5 times. If the use evidence cannot be provided in the end, the trademark will be invalid.
(2)"Actual Use": This basis is applicable to the case where the trademark was already used in the United States when the application for registration was submitted. When filing an application for trademark registration on the basis of "already used", evidence of the use of the trademark in the United States and the earliest date of use shall be provided.
(3)"Registration in Other Countries": This basis is used when an application for registration of the same trademark has been submitted in the origin country and the applicant cannot provide mark use evidence in the United States for a short period of time. Application information (including designated goods/services) in the US application should be consistent with those in the application of origin country, and a copy of registration certificate in the origin country should be provided.
Title
Jurisdiction
Type
Update Date
-
-
{{item.title.slice(0,60)}}{{item.title.length>60?"...":""}}
{{item.date}}
-
{{item.haha}}
- {{ipType[item.ipType]}}
-
Ready to Manage Your IP Portfolio Smarter?
From AI-powered trademark search to marketplace monitoring — the Kangxin IP Platform turns knowledge into results.
Explore the Kangxin IP Platform
Put your IP knowledge into practice with our comprehensive suite of AI-powered tools.
Disclaimer: We will do our best to present you with as complete and accurate information as
possible.
However, due to the limited frequency of content updates in some countries, all content is for reference
only and has no legal effect.
Jane Chen
